Beer Forum

Search Forum                       Advanced Search

  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2007, 05:26 AM
TAPMAN TAPMAN is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: York, PA. , USA.
Posts: 199
Default Glycol mix

For years (been in the business for 23 years) we used a 50/50 mix for glycol. Micromatic suggests 2.5 water to 1 glycol. The glycol coolers up until recently had 50/50 mix posted on it, now they have 2.5/1 on it. Just wondering the reasoning behind the change? Tapman
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2007, 10:54 AM
Beer Dr Beer Dr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Plains,PA , USA.
Posts: 169
Default

In my opinion the newer power packs are becoming better insulated and your not having as much of a problem with the glycol become dilluted from condensation. I still think work needs to be done in improving the short run power packs though. The 125 ft and above seem to be holding the mix pretty good now.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007, 08:50 PM
Jeff Stanley Jeff Stanley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: , , .
Posts: 18
Send a message via Yahoo to Jeff Stanley
Default

it is more the power pack than the chemical

older power packs arent sealed as well and get more condensation. With these old units, you start stronger so you can go longer between changing because they dilute so quickly

stick with 50/50 if it gets humid where you ****. Most tanks still arent sealed well. You can use the 2.5/1 on completely sealed tanks like on k-ways or newer sealed ****** units. I use 50/50 with all micromatic units


I wouldnt go any stronger than 50/50. You need water for system efficiency. Water can carry heat better than propelyne glycol. the water is doing the w o r k of moving the heat, the glycol keeps it liquid
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2007, 05:41 AM
Larry Tapper Larry Tapper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: , , USA.
Posts: 118
Default

I've Had to go stronger than 50/50 because of an ice bank on the coils cooling the glycol, this ice will not let the glycol get below 31-32 degrees and the systems run to foamy. This seems to **** o.k. after the glycol get cold.
__________________
L. Tapper
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2007, 12:02 PM
TAPMAN TAPMAN is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: York, PA. , USA.
Posts: 199
Default

Is that one of the old PL units that MM used to sell? I had a lot of trouble maintaining a proper glycol level in those pieces of junk. There was a reason they quit selling those. Tapman
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:45 PM.

Note:
Micro Matic’s Draft Beer Discussion forum is a public service which allows our members to share their draft beer knowledge and for visitors to view their discussions. While Micro Matic's Dispense Institute instructors and knowledgeable staff are often participates in the forum, Micro Matic does not attempt to verify information posted by members. The information which members post are personal views, and may not reflect the views of Micro Matic. Micro Matic takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any information posted by members, or results that occur from the information. Micro Matic reserves the right to monitor, remove or edit content at its discretion.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.