|
|

04-20-2006, 12:58 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: , , USA.
Posts: 117
|
|
Inventory control modules
Does anyone have experience or knowledge of these inline draft beer flow modules that I’m starting to see? Basically each draft line is cut in the walk-in cooler and the module inserted in line, it is hard wired into the managers office and draft consumption is monitored for inventory purposes. I have noticed occasionally a line that is heavily poured at peak hours will foam up. Is it just a coincidence or can these units pose a problem. Is there any resistance in them to be taken into consideration when setting pressure?
|

04-20-2006, 11:26 PM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,562
|
|
Anytime you place a device in the flow of beer there can be issues with gas breakout. To assure the success with these units it is critical to have the system balanced to the tee and cleaned and maintained impeccably.
Scott Zuhse, Instructor Micro Matic Dispense Institute
|

04-21-2006, 05:14 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: , , USA.
Posts: 118
|
|
Having the same problem, would be nice if people where just honest. Some accounts went to cameras.
L. Tapper
|

04-22-2006, 01:37 PM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,562
|
|
Unfortunately, most systems available either cause dispensing problems or can easily be overcome by staff. The best method that I am aware of is to physically measure inventory on a regular basis. There are companies that will inventory not just the draught but all bar inventory and report removals to the gram. Most certainly, if the receipts do not match the removals, there probably needs to be a significant intervention as to staff training and policy.
Scott Zuhse, Instructor Micro Matic Dispense Institute
|

04-22-2006, 04:43 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: , , USA.
Posts: 117
|
|
I have several places that now use these items and not a single one have asked me how much beer is discarded when the lines are cleaned –what happens to their data when we circulate chemicals through the line for 10 -15 minutes and then flush them. Sounds more like a scam to me since these questions are not asked. I find it amazing that owners will spend that kind of money when if they would educate their bartenders on how to pour a proper draft into a “beer clean glass” they would get at least another 10 glasses out of a keg.
|

04-22-2006, 06:11 PM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,562
|
|
Not sure what items you are referring to. As to line cleaning, 3/8" I'D line carries 3/4 oz. of beer per foot. Depending on your line length and number of faucets, you should be able to calculate beer cost per cleaning.
Scott Zuhse, Instructor Micro Matic Dispense Institute
|

04-24-2006, 12:15 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: , , USA.
Posts: 117
|
|
Scott; I was refering to the inventory control modules --- If you circulate chemicals through these lines for 10 minutes it has to show a large useage and no manager has ever asked how long I circulate 10 or 15 minutes?
|

04-24-2006, 06:44 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: , , USA.
Posts: 118
|
|
On the systems I clean I turn the meter system to a clean cycle. then when I'm done back to counter .
L. Tapper
|

04-25-2006, 07:39 AM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,562
|
|
Most of these units such as Auper have a cleaning mode.
Scott Zuhse, Instructor Micro Matic Dispense Institute
|

05-19-2006, 10:39 AM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: , , USA.
Posts: 3
|
|
I've had pretty good success with Sprint Enterprises' Beer Guardian.
It's based on a in-line turbine design that measures beer usage for each beer line without weighing, etc. The best part is also its simplicity.
A simple digital counter is mounted in our office (the measuring turbines are at the kegs in the cooler) and we take beginning and ending shift reads of each meter. A simple calculation of sales into ounces vs. usage in ounces and voila instant control. A simple form can suffice for perpetual inventory tracking and later calculation.
Of course, depending on the number of stations, etc., you may want to add more meters for finer accountability. But it won't impact the beer quality or taste.
As for beer line cleaning, we simply take a reading before (before the existing beer inline is pushed out) and after the cleaning (after the water rinse but before the new beer is pushed through) to eliminate the cleaning from our measurement.
You can get more info at www.sprintent.com
|

05-21-2006, 12:24 PM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,562
|
|
If you want accurate measurement of all opened liquor, wine and beer inventory, the most accurate program is offered by Bevinco. They weigh everything and compare with POS system. They can also consult with management on how to rectify discrepancies. Check out .
Scott Zuhse, Instructor Micro Matic Dispense Institute
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
temp control issues
|
burns |
Kegerators & Kegerator Kits @ Home |
5 |
03-27-2006 05:08 PM |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:50 PM.
Note:
Micro Matic’s Draft Beer Discussion forum is a public service which allows our members to share their draft beer knowledge and for visitors to view their discussions.
While Micro Matic's Dispense Institute instructors and knowledgeable staff are often participates in the forum, Micro Matic does not attempt to verify information posted by members. The information which members post are personal views, and may not reflect the views of Micro Matic. Micro Matic takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any information posted by members, or results that occur from the information.
Micro Matic reserves the right to monitor, remove or edit content at its discretion.
|
|
|
|
|